![]() The 8x10 question: I'll try an approximation of an 8x10 tomorrow. ![]() Vincent at photo-i is scheduled to do a real review. But I don't think so because my fine detail from the 3200 looks like other full res images I've seen posted. So don't go buying this scanner based on my 45 minutes of experience. Tomorrow I will try some very dense chromes to see how it pulls out the dark details.Įxploring the full hardware resolution should be interesting but I don't have time now and resolution really isn't the issue with these low cost scanners and large format. I'm not going to spend a lot of time evaluating the images because a small near-sighted child could immediately tell which image is better. Automatic brightness with all other functions, including sharpening set to off. I compared a 2400 dpi scan from the Canon to a 3200 dpi from the Epson. It looks much more like a drum scan before unsharp mask. With the Canon the very fine detail is soft but the edges are their for sharpening. Very fine detail from my Epson always looks like mush. Sharpness, color and handling of dynamic range. So with that background I'll say that the Canon scanner is way better than my Epson 3200. ![]() Either it gets sent back tomorrow or I miss the return period. I'm a color shooter, it's fall, and I'm traveling about five days a week for the next four weeks. So my decision here is to keep or send back the 9950f.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |